| I hate to say it but that fringe has only recently gone. I should've ditched it sooner |
Monday, 23 December 2013
The introduction to my autobiography...
Labels:
autobiography,
baby,
childhood,
creative writing,
dad,
family,
holiday,
homework,
life,
mum,
post office,
school,
sister,
teenager,
work,
writing
Sunday, 15 December 2013
School homework - 'Write an introduction to a novel'
“It’s gonna be okay”. But it’s not going to be okay is it?
People always say that, but how do they even know?
My friend Tara always says it, and then chuckles as I snarl,
“you don’t know it will be okay”. “God
Georgia, you’re so pessimistic for a 15 year old! Lighten up a little,” she
says it with a grin, but I know that when she uses my full name instead of
‘Gee’, she’s being serious. I understand where she’s coming from but it’s so
difficult to lighten up when everything in my life is so dark. Nothing’s going
to be okay for me; even Tara, my best friend, doesn’t understand this.
I don’t try to be miserable, misery just has a way of
finding its way to me and making sure that I know nothing is ever alright. It
snakes its way through even my happiest memories, tinting them with the doubt
that relentlessly whispers to me ‘why should you have this happy memory?’ So
when Tara naively tries to cheer me up, it is thrown back in her face as I
remember why nothing will ever be okay again.
My thoughts are constantly flickering, like the sound on an
old CD which jumps and stalls, but unlike track 6 on Take That’s first album,
or the last track on ‘Now That’s What I Call Music! 24’, my thoughts always go
back to the same place. I used to be a bright and happy child. Normal, I guess,
but everything changed when I was 7…
Where do you think this story is going? Write the next part in the comments for me!
Where do you think this story is going? Write the next part in the comments for me!
Labels:
creative writing,
friend,
girl,
homework,
introduction,
novel,
okay,
optimistic,
pessimistic,
school,
task
Sunday, 10 November 2013
A piece of creative writing which includes certain given phrases
NOTE: The phrases which I had to include are in bold
As my pace quickened, my surroundings
slowed. Every step, fuelled by the relentless rhythm of my heartbeat, seemed
like an eternity. The silence was overpowering yet I could tell someone was
there. The shadow of the trees? From the corner of my eyes they were creepy
figures. The flap of a bird’s wings? These quickly became the pounce of the
enemy. The darkness of the sky? I knew this was the spotlight in which my
murder would occur.
Lost, scared and alone, I became two people.
A shell and a consciousness. The frightened shell of a girl began to cry but I
ignored her tears. Tears smell of vulnerability and vulnerability smells of
danger.
Stay confident.
Stay brave.
Stay alive.
People say we only have 5 senses, but at
that moment I had 6. He was there, I knew it and I guess, deep down, I knew my
fate. I smelt the faint stench of his coffee-tainted breath, and his staccato
pant was not even drowned out by the unforgiving harsh Autumn winds. The snap
of a branch behind me could not be passed off as an innocent four legged
animal, it could only be the aggressive stomp of his heavy boots.
My consciousness knew what to do; it took
the fear and twisted it. Reshaped it. Used it. Fear became adrenaline which
spurred on my legs to run faster. I whispered for my legs to help me, to speed
on, to sense the danger. They had to rise to the challenge; it was their time
to be heroes. I needed my legs to get me out of the forest, which would be
quickly transformed into a taped-off murder scene by the morning. But they
wouldn’t believe me, they didn’t sense the urgency. My adrenaline wasn’t enough
for me to rapidly carry myself out of the forest. I tripped at every
opportunity, each tumble bringing me closer to the inevitable.
I fought, begged and pleaded. Not only on
that night, but on the lead up to it. “Don’t”, “Stop it”, “Go away”, “Leave me
alone”. How many times can you say the same thing? I cried … again. Not from
the pain, the pain came later on, but from the fact that he had, once more,
succeeded. The most painful part was the sound of his laughter; it was the
first time I had heard him laugh and this was when both me and him realized, as
I lay tripped on the ground, that he had won. I wonder if he laughs at all of
his victims.
I’m not sure where I was but I saw it all.
I was now separated from my shell, who lay, waiting to be found. My memory
appears in flashes.
The dog walker, not knowing that this would
change her life forever. How can you forget the image of what lay in front of her
in a muddy ditch?
The police, breezing over their emotions as
they, naively, tried to piece together what had happened as if they had a
chance. He’s done it before and he’ll do it again, don’t get involved. I should
know. I got involved.
My father, having to make that transition
from the anger over my overstepped curfew to the … well he doesn’t know what he
feels. Perhaps he is still angry. Maybe he is just sad. I hope he stays strong.
My mother, crumpled in a heap as she
receives the news, and later, (much later) arrives at the harsh reality that
I’m never coming home.
…and Him. With no thought other than “so
who’s next?”
In around 500 words, write either the beginning, 'magic moment' or endto a romance style novel. Include a variety of euphemisms and cliches
As the rain pattered against the rattling taxi window, she
realised what she was losing. She didn’t know his second name, his favourite
colour, how many siblings he had. She had not met his parents or been on
holiday with him. She did not know him in a way that she knew her best friend
or her parents, but in that second as he closed the car door and walked up to
the train station, she knew one thing. She wanted to be with him. She loved
him.
It did not take her long to realise what she had to. After
forcing the driver to grind to a halt, she had never moved quicker, dodging
past anonymous figures on the platform and fighting, begging and pleading with
destiny to stop him getting onto the train. Raindrops splattered down, merely
adding to the tears which tricked down her delicate cheeks whilst her panic
built up.
“John! John! Stop!” she cried with sheer determination as
onlookers jumped in confusion. He was an oblivious target in the distance, but
somehow the only image that was focused in her eyes; he mattered and suddenly
the argument didn’t.
Heart in mouth, she stumbled through the mob of people. It
didn’t matter that she bumped into an elderly gentlemen, or barged through a
couple, deep in conversation. They all loved people, they would understand her
desperation if only they knew.
The train pulled in and people moved to get on. She was now
desperate; her length of opportunity was being harshly monitored by the speed
at which passengers boarded the train, which was impatiently waiting to depart.
As hoards of people moved towards the train, she lost sight of John. The train
left. And the crowd of people who had got off the train and spectators who had
been saying goodbye to people began to disband. She never even got to say
goodbye.
Heart in mouth, she stumbled to a wall and leant against it,
suddenly letting the tears flow. She couldn’t support herself and collapsed
onto the ground, not even caring that she was drenched from the puddle
underneath her. The minute she had realised how much he was worth was the
minute that she lost him. She sat there, head in hands and shivering from both
the cold and the loneliness she felt. What was she to do now?
Suddenly she felt a warmth on her shoulder, with all of her
hope based on this one sense, she looked up but her disappointment was reimbursed
merely with a uniformed platform attendant telling her to move on.
As she stood up, wondering what to do next, she looked ahead
of her, and that’s when she saw him. John. Sat on a bench watching her.
“I couldn’t do it,” he exclaimed, “I couldn’t leave you”.
Wednesday, 2 October 2013
Thoughts on The X Factor 2013
It's that time of the year again when families all over Britain snuggle down on a Saturday evening and prepare themselves for an evening of 'X Factor entertainment'. I love this show, and have done since Leona Lewis's victory, even though this meant staying loyal through the rougher days of Jedward, Wagner and (although I'll admit I had a crush on him) Frankie Cocozza. Although the auditions are my favourite part every year - giving us a proper laugh and something to talk about on a Monday morning during double maths, what keeps me hooked is the way we fall for an act and support it until it's (inevitable) last show - whether it be an ending in week 8 (I was a strong Chico supporter) or the grand final (I was one of thousands who were gutted when 1D came third!) we all love to follow their progress through the shows and backstage activities.
I cannot review this part of the programme yet as we have only just started the series and the acts are not long out of bootcamp, however from what I have seen, I am slightly disappointed with the re-vamped format this year. I love the room auditions as these provide us with the truly hilarious and outrageous auditions that everybody remembers, however why can the auditions not stop at these? I find the Sunday night 'stage' auditions very tedious and do not understand why acts need to be auditioned twice; as far as I know there have been no major problems with single auditions before? Furthermore the show is simply not the same without our own Simon Cowell. In his absence, the judges try too hard to fill his place instead of making their own mark on the show.
I look forward to seeing how this new format pans out, but at the moment I am not impressed with the X Factor 2013; it is turning into one of those programmes that stays on the Sky Planner for weeks until it builds up and we eventually delete a few odd episodes, and this is coming from a previously avid viewer!
I cannot review this part of the programme yet as we have only just started the series and the acts are not long out of bootcamp, however from what I have seen, I am slightly disappointed with the re-vamped format this year. I love the room auditions as these provide us with the truly hilarious and outrageous auditions that everybody remembers, however why can the auditions not stop at these? I find the Sunday night 'stage' auditions very tedious and do not understand why acts need to be auditioned twice; as far as I know there have been no major problems with single auditions before? Furthermore the show is simply not the same without our own Simon Cowell. In his absence, the judges try too hard to fill his place instead of making their own mark on the show.
I look forward to seeing how this new format pans out, but at the moment I am not impressed with the X Factor 2013; it is turning into one of those programmes that stays on the Sky Planner for weeks until it builds up and we eventually delete a few odd episodes, and this is coming from a previously avid viewer!
A (very long) The Trueman Show (for a piece of school work)
We
all felt a bit paranoid after watching The Truman Show. What is real life? As
Truman Burbank (Jim Carrey- Bruce Almighty) suddenly realises all is not what
it seems in Sea Haven, we play along with the game; desperate for Truman to see
what his life really is- a TV show. Ed Harris plays the determined and controlling
Christof, owner of the controversial ‘fish-tank-like’ programme following the
life of Truman, a television idol since birth. As we see the audience glued to
their screens watching Truman’s every move, we realise how much power the media
has in our modern world; this was the principal moral of the movie. Peter Weir
is the real director of the film and he makes us feel that we are the audience
watching the show, with occasional imperfect camera angles, discreet clues
about the real world and special effects to add feeling to each scene but still
keep the star of the show ignorant to his fame. Without much information on the
storyline, only knowing that it was a sci-fi drama based around a TV show, my
expectations were quite modest and it completely exceeded my predicaments, due
to the clever methods of filming the show and the originality of the storyline.
Truman’s
apparent normal life is suddenly thrown into confusion when he pieces together
the small aspects that don’t seem to add up in his world. We watch him trying
to overcome the discreet manipulation that the TV producers use to turn his
ignorance into a high-rated show. I found the film very interesting and
gripping, despite being borderline predictable and having a slow start. The
climax was exciting and kept me on the edge of my seat, pleading for Truman to
be granted justice and the ability to get out of Seahaven.
Jim
Carrey does a fantastic job convincing the real audience that Truman is
clueless about the show. He plays the character well, using good actions and
facial expressions to portray the idea that Truman is suspicious and paranoid
about his life. We sympathise with him because we see how innocent and genuine he
really is, and how he has been controlled throughout his life. Laura Linney
plays Truman’s wife, Meryl- she does a brilliant job in portraying her
character as a bad actress, making a few slip-ups in keeping the secret quiet
from Truman. Her facial expressions are unconvincing, forever reminding us that
she is acting as Truman’s wife, tactfully edging away from him and remaining
professional around him, never looking very comfortable. She didn’t gain any
sympathy as it was her decision to trick Truman for her own benefit; she
manipulated him and never took him seriously. Ed Harris (Christof)’s character
is ambiguous to Truman; at the beginning, he plays a God-like figure to him,
creator of his world. However at the end, we see that he has watched Truman’s
whole life and feels protective and paternal over him. In the end scene, when
Christof reveals everything, we realise he is upset to see him leave, his voice
becomes softer and his words to Truman are fatherly. We can understand how
Christof felt, wanting to keep Truman in Seahaven for longer, but I don’t
sympathise with him. He might feel a love for Truman now, but originally he did
it for entertainment purposes. In an interview, the interviewer says ‘Thanks
for giving up so much of your precious time to talk to us’, Christof acts like
this is a generous thing for him to do, but Truman has given his whole life up
and Christof doesn’t realise how differently Truman could have lived without
being on the show.
The
scenes are shot in a very natural and interesting way. The settings are
beautifully lit, always very bright and colourful with plenty of detail. The
cameras are cleverly positioned; many are from specifically low or high angles,
giving the feeling that Truman is being watched. It singles him out and makes
him look alone, the only one who doesn’t know the truth behind his life. Sometimes
the angles make him look smaller and more vulnerable. Many cameras are hidden
in the costumes and sets. To show this, some edges are blacked out, giving the
effect of a button or desk camera. Sometimes, with these angles, the cameras
are very jolty and have more noticeable zooms. This portrays people purposely
watching him. During Truman’s life, the technology improves. We see him as a
baby staring at a mobile above his cot with a camera hanging off; as Truman
grows, the cameras get more discreetly hidden and the shots less ‘perfectly’
placed and captured. In the last scene, as Truman steps out into the real
world, we only see darkness, symbolising that he has been watched his whole life
and now he should be free.
The
soundtrack to the film is very subtle and natural. It means that Truman is
always in the spotlight. Watching the film, I didn’t really notice much backing
music, but when I did notice some, it added emotion and atmosphere to the
feeling of the scene. It draws people in and the simplicity and sincerity of the
melody added to the innocence of Truman.
This
film is topical in our age of reality TV shows and celebrity personalities- it
is often compared to George Orwell’s ‘1984’, which is similarly about being
watched and lack of freedom. As somebody who enjoys watching reality TV and
often reads Hello magazine, I completely understand how Truman was manipulated
into a celebrity-shaped TV star for the public’s enjoyment. The last scene really
links to real life, where the audience (previously gripped to their screens
throughout Truman’s last shows) switch to another channel and have nothing else
to say about the show’s dramatic finish. It portrays that fame isn’t forever
and media is always forgotten. It shows that the audience only wanted
entertainment, and didn’t care for the effect it had on Truman. I would
recommend this film to anybody older than 12, who enjoy reading about
celebrities and reality-life, because it gave me a great insight into how a
celebrity must feel, being watched everyday; however I don’t think anybody
younger would understand the concept, or notice the film’s subtle details.
The
Truman Show was extremely cleverly written, and the storyline was enjoyable to
watch. I would rate it an 8/10, because I haven’t ever seen a film like it and
I thought the extra effort taken to see the film from interesting camera angles
improved it lots; it lost out on 2 points because sometimes, it was quite slow
moving and confusing.
Teenage Swearing
When I say ‘damn’, you hear ‘suffer eternal punishment in hell’
As a 16 year old, I am more than confident in expressing my opinions or merely thoughts using numerous swear words, sometimes over excessively. As with many of my friends, we find ourselves saying phrases such as ‘fuck off’ or ‘that was shit’ and this is widely recognised by most people as, not only an insult, but a way of emphasising a point. However in the literal sense, these phrases sound ridiculously childish and don’t even make sense. According to the British dictionary, when my sister grabs the remote and switches channels, I tell her to ‘sexual intercourse off’ and after seeing the fourth Twilight film, I retorted ‘that was faeces’. Well clearly it wasn’t but the use of this language has developed in a way that one should take offence to these phrases. Furthermore, words like these are used so commonly that many people, mostly peers to my age group, have grown immune to them and calling your best friend a ‘whore’ is now seen as more of a sign of close friendship.
As a 16 year old, I am more than confident in expressing my opinions or merely thoughts using numerous swear words, sometimes over excessively. As with many of my friends, we find ourselves saying phrases such as ‘fuck off’ or ‘that was shit’ and this is widely recognised by most people as, not only an insult, but a way of emphasising a point. However in the literal sense, these phrases sound ridiculously childish and don’t even make sense. According to the British dictionary, when my sister grabs the remote and switches channels, I tell her to ‘sexual intercourse off’ and after seeing the fourth Twilight film, I retorted ‘that was faeces’. Well clearly it wasn’t but the use of this language has developed in a way that one should take offence to these phrases. Furthermore, words like these are used so commonly that many people, mostly peers to my age group, have grown immune to them and calling your best friend a ‘whore’ is now seen as more of a sign of close friendship.
Having said this, people in the older generation do not
react to the words in the same way. They are neither immune to the words, nor
viewing them in the literal ‘Oxford dictionary’ sense. After telling my dad
‘this pasta tastes like crap’ and remarking to my mum that ‘my teacher is a
bitch’ I was sent to my room and the wifi was turned off. Please note, when the
wifi is turned off in my house, it is a big deal. In fairness, I do not think
that my parents are naïve enough to believe that I don’t swear at all, I think
that with teenage swearing, the parents first experience shock that their child
finally knows these words and is choosing to use them, losing their innocence.
Most parents do not teach their children these words, so it comes as a surprise
when they pop up in conversation – how did she learn these? Naturally, the
parents make it very clear that these words are unacceptable but as with
anything, if one is told not to do something, ‘caution hot surface’, they will
probably try to do it, ‘shit that’s hot’.
The parent’s despair comes from when they realise they
cannot stop their children from learning these words. The frustration of taking
time to monitor their teenager’s television viewing and reading to ensure these
profanities are not taught to them, and then realising that someone at school
has filled them in with the latest curses must be overwhelming. It is somewhat
worse as the parent does not even know which words are in their vocabulary, and
so every mother’s worst nightmare is their child spontaneously quoting Ron
Weasley at Sunday dinner with the grandparents by exclaiming ‘that was bloody
brilliant’. Perhaps the child does not even realise that this can be seen as offensive
for people who were brought up to understand the word as blasphemous, and so
when granny starts choking on her roast potato after this comment, the child is
none the wiser, they have merely complimented her cooking.
Teenagers are forever trying to overstep the boundaries; I
personally know that swearing will make my parents go ballistic at me during an
argument, which is my exact aim. However similarly, I realise that my parents
use the words too, just not as often and general. This means that even they
realise it would be hypocritical of them to take offence at me using these
words so the need for punishment comes when they are used unnecessarily or to
purposely cause offence. I believe that people think teenage swearing is an
issue not because nobody else knows these words, but because they are taught
them by other people so they come as a shock, even though most of the time one
is not trying to offend. The universal definition for swear words has been
naturally changed so generations have different ideas on one’s intention after
saying these words.
A (fairly serious) article about an issue facing teenage girls today (school work)
One of the most prominent problems facing teenage girls
today is the latest media technology that is available to them at their
fingertips. Despite the fantastic changes it has made to society, it also has a
more negative affect on some aspects of our lives.
Firstly, the invention of the contraceptive pill in the
1960’s enriched the lives of so many people. It meant that children were not
born into families where they were unwanted or could not have a stable life,
and it gave women a choice about what they wanted to do with their lives. However
in these modern times, this easily obtainable pill has become far too common so
more and more girls (and their partners) take for granted the fact that they
can have sex without getting pregnant. This increases the pressure for girls to
have sex in an unstable or new relationship.
Additionally, the development of media in the 21st
century means that role models to young women have dramatically changed.
Whereas 100 years ago, girls would have looked up to authors such as Jane
Austen and Louisa May Alcott, or their favourite characters from books, with
the invention and success of the television, they now look up to the likes of
the Kardashian family, people from reality shows like ‘The Only Way Is Essex’ and
other such celebrities. This means instead of having realistic aspirations such
as becoming a servant for a rich family or having a respectable and well-paid
job, girls are now obsessed with mimicking the ‘model’ look and becoming famous.
These expectations encourage girls to try and change their image to look like
their favourite celebrities, which in some cases makes girls want to become
super-skinny and painted in make-up. Young women do not have as much time, nor
money, to achieve these looks so as a result, try to rush their appearance
using crash diets and overpowering make up.
Furthermore, new technology such as digital cameras mean
that girls are bound to be snapped anytime they socialize, so for them, looking
good is a necessity. Networking sites such as Facebook make it so much easier
to share photos, and also comment quickly and easily. This gives girls another
insecurity; it is too easy for people to make comments or judgements over
people they barely know, so girls are unconfident and self-conscious, forever
needing to look attractive. In television, one style usually takes over the
world of celebrities for a few months and so in this time, normal girls are
expected to take on this image – girls who don’t are usually bombarded with
offensive labels and stereotypes, such as being ‘emo’.
The recent progressions in the world of plastic surgery now
teach different morals to young women; the fact that it is so easy to have a
blemish removed, or body parts changed gives the idea that imperfections are
not acceptable and we should all change ourselves to become ‘perfect’. Cosmetic
surgery pressurizes people about their image, and celebrities whose surgical
enhancements have been widely publicised advertise the fact that unnaturally
changing the body is the ‘cool’ thing to do. Additionally, when girls eagerly
look over the latest glamour magazines they see beautiful models pictured in
articles, they do not realise that these have been airbrushed or photoshopped,
so therefore they believe that they should look like this – this is a massive
confidence breaker. With so many pictures of influential people looking perfect
and fault-free, it is becoming an expectation that girls should look this way,
when in reality nobody does.
I think technology has many fantastic advantages but as with
many things, it also comes with a price. Our mothers and grandmothers would
have been influenced by the Hollywood film stars of their day and would have
tried to have copied their look and behaviour (like the craze of smoking).
However, the difference today is the constant 24:7 bombardment of mass media
and technology which makes it so difficult for young girls to be individual and
stand out from the crowd.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)